My brother and sister had vague plans. They had sodas and snacks, and they planned to stay up until midnight. Why, I asked Mom, were they doing this?
"They want to celebrate the new year."
Why?
"Because that's what people do."
I was six, my brother and sister thirteen and eleven--enough older than me that I figured this must be some vaguely grown-up thing. I never stayed up until midnight, but I saw the footage on TV every year of people who did, people crowded together in cold weather, wearing fancy clothes and silly hats, raising glasses in honor of...something.
To me, the new year only represented the end of Christmas vacation. In a couple days I'd be back in school, my brief, glorious period of freedom ended. It wasn't a new beginning, it was an ending. The good times were winding down.
Guess I've always been that way. I've never put much stock into the promise of a bright and shiny new year. Arbitrary markings of time aside, it's just another day. Sure, as I got older, my brother and I took to ironically watching New Year's Rockin' Eve, an act of condescension that eventually became a full-blown ritual, so maybe the joke was on us all along.
Also, of course, I got married on New Year's Eve, and we joked that we picked that date so we could remember our anniversary, but five years later, we'd have no more anniversaries to mark. And for some time after that, I'd try to pretend the evening had no significance, just another night, not a reminder of failure and regret.
But hey, don't let my sourness ruin your mood. I'm doing okay as this year draws to a close. I have to work, so no midnight celebrations here, but let's face it, I probably wouldn't stay up anyway. Still, let me offer wishes to anyone who happens to read this:
Happy New Year.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
SUBSTITUTE "BEAGLE" FOR "GUN", AND "BOUNCE AROUND ADORABLY" FOR "FIRE IT"--IT'S JUST LIKE THAT CHEKHOV QUOTE!
Ordinarily I wouldn't go see a family-friendly crowd-pleaser like We Bought A Zoo, but hey, it was Christmas, Janie and I wanted to go out and, frankly, if you're looking for a relaxing good time at the movies, there aren't many choices.
And really, it's not bad at all. You can sense writer-director Cameron Crowe trying to put a more personal spin on the original script, by Aline Brosh McKenna, author of such by-the-numbers claptrap as Morning Glory and (ugh) 27 Dresses. There are formulaic elements, but Crowe does his best to ignore them, aided immeasurably by Matt Damon's fine performance as a grieving widower trying to do right by his kids while still trying to sort out his own emotions.
So things happen--you might be surprised to learn that Damon buys a zoo--and the whole thing glides along nicely thanks to likeable actors and Rodrigo Prieto's shimmering cinematography. There is, however, one serious flaw that makes the whole movie unwatchable, in my opinion.
The family owns a beagle. There's an early, pre-zoo-buying scene in which Damon's adorable daughter is fixing a sandwich at the kitchen table while the dog just sleeps pleasantly in the other room. I'm not saying that's impossible, but in my experience, any self-respecting beagle is going to be right there at the kid's feet, just in case any food drops onto the floor.
But where the movie just turns into some sort of alternate-universe science fiction crap is when they get to the zoo. And the dog, again, just kind of sits on the porch, or otherwise completely ignores his surroundings.
I'm sorry, but this just isn't possible. This is a scenting dog! In a zoo! He's going to be going nuts, chasing down all the assorted animal smells. For crying out loud, there are foxes at this zoo, and he's a hunting dog. That's a plot point just waiting to happen, and the movie inexplicably ignores it in favor of a wandering bear, a dying tiger and some manufactured fake suspense over whether or not the zoo can be brought up to code.
I realize the vast majority of people could care less about this sort of thing--when I ranted about this to my brother, he said, "I didn't realize beagle owners were even more self-righteous than Mac users"--but I think it should be a good rule of thumb for all filmmakers: If you're going to bring a beagle onscreen, you'd better find something for it to do.
Or at least give it a few more close-ups.
And really, it's not bad at all. You can sense writer-director Cameron Crowe trying to put a more personal spin on the original script, by Aline Brosh McKenna, author of such by-the-numbers claptrap as Morning Glory and (ugh) 27 Dresses. There are formulaic elements, but Crowe does his best to ignore them, aided immeasurably by Matt Damon's fine performance as a grieving widower trying to do right by his kids while still trying to sort out his own emotions.
So things happen--you might be surprised to learn that Damon buys a zoo--and the whole thing glides along nicely thanks to likeable actors and Rodrigo Prieto's shimmering cinematography. There is, however, one serious flaw that makes the whole movie unwatchable, in my opinion.
The family owns a beagle. There's an early, pre-zoo-buying scene in which Damon's adorable daughter is fixing a sandwich at the kitchen table while the dog just sleeps pleasantly in the other room. I'm not saying that's impossible, but in my experience, any self-respecting beagle is going to be right there at the kid's feet, just in case any food drops onto the floor.
But where the movie just turns into some sort of alternate-universe science fiction crap is when they get to the zoo. And the dog, again, just kind of sits on the porch, or otherwise completely ignores his surroundings.
I'm sorry, but this just isn't possible. This is a scenting dog! In a zoo! He's going to be going nuts, chasing down all the assorted animal smells. For crying out loud, there are foxes at this zoo, and he's a hunting dog. That's a plot point just waiting to happen, and the movie inexplicably ignores it in favor of a wandering bear, a dying tiger and some manufactured fake suspense over whether or not the zoo can be brought up to code.
I realize the vast majority of people could care less about this sort of thing--when I ranted about this to my brother, he said, "I didn't realize beagle owners were even more self-righteous than Mac users"--but I think it should be a good rule of thumb for all filmmakers: If you're going to bring a beagle onscreen, you'd better find something for it to do.
Or at least give it a few more close-ups.
Monday, December 26, 2011
AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?
I take Isabella out for her morning walk, my mind racing through the list of things I have to do before I even go to work: Finish the laundry, wash dishes, plan the week's breakfasts and lunches. Then there are things for later, like deciding which bills to pay first.
It's the day after Christmas, and life goes on.
Whether we mean to or not, we all invest too much in this particular holiday. We carry some ideal of what it should be, or memories of a perfect past that can never be recaptured, and on some level, there is always disappointment. But that feeling of melancholy--is that the right word?--never fully kicks in until the day after.
That's when we shuffle back to work, or return the disappointing gifts, or otherwise realize that our dreams once again didn't quite come true. Nice things happen, good things, yes, but that elusive magic we recall from childhood just never quite reappears. And it will be a whole year before we can reach for it again.
Ah, but we become more aware of our own mortality with each passing year, and more aware, too, that the perfection we seek will never happen. Things are put in better perspective, a hard-won wisdom that tells us that our dreams and disappointments are both equally fleeting. Things don't mean what they once did because they simply can't, there's no time to dwell on what might have been or what once was. Life goes on regardless.
Isabella picks up a scent and pulls on the leash. For her, there is only here and now. That should be enough for anyone.
It's the day after Christmas, and life goes on.
Whether we mean to or not, we all invest too much in this particular holiday. We carry some ideal of what it should be, or memories of a perfect past that can never be recaptured, and on some level, there is always disappointment. But that feeling of melancholy--is that the right word?--never fully kicks in until the day after.
That's when we shuffle back to work, or return the disappointing gifts, or otherwise realize that our dreams once again didn't quite come true. Nice things happen, good things, yes, but that elusive magic we recall from childhood just never quite reappears. And it will be a whole year before we can reach for it again.
Ah, but we become more aware of our own mortality with each passing year, and more aware, too, that the perfection we seek will never happen. Things are put in better perspective, a hard-won wisdom that tells us that our dreams and disappointments are both equally fleeting. Things don't mean what they once did because they simply can't, there's no time to dwell on what might have been or what once was. Life goes on regardless.
Isabella picks up a scent and pulls on the leash. For her, there is only here and now. That should be enough for anyone.
Friday, December 23, 2011
I HAVEN'T LONG TO STAY
Back in the day--as recently as the mid-seventies--this thing used to pop up on local stations whenever their programming would run a couple minutes short. And...well, yeah, okay, even as a kid I was prone to depression. But honestly, is there any mood to be conjured by this other than overwhelming despair?
Is it the unaccompanied voices of the Norman Luboff Choir, apparently recorded in a public restroom? Is it the cheap design and animation, which tries to conjure visions of an enchanted wonderland while suggesting nothing so much as a Christmas pageant performed by the residents of an underfunded mental hospital?
Or is it the song itself? Specifically, Suzy's reminder that she hasn't long to stay? "I'll be your best friend," she says, "but don't get too accustomed to me, don't let messy emotions get involved, don't love me, dear God, no, because soon I'll be gone, like a dream before the breaking dawn."
Why was this even produced? Surely it was conceived with one purpose in mind: to introduce kids to the concept of mortality, as a plodding reminder that our time is brief, that all the wonders of creation are ultimately impermanent.
That's what they were going for, right?
Is it the unaccompanied voices of the Norman Luboff Choir, apparently recorded in a public restroom? Is it the cheap design and animation, which tries to conjure visions of an enchanted wonderland while suggesting nothing so much as a Christmas pageant performed by the residents of an underfunded mental hospital?
Or is it the song itself? Specifically, Suzy's reminder that she hasn't long to stay? "I'll be your best friend," she says, "but don't get too accustomed to me, don't let messy emotions get involved, don't love me, dear God, no, because soon I'll be gone, like a dream before the breaking dawn."
Why was this even produced? Surely it was conceived with one purpose in mind: to introduce kids to the concept of mortality, as a plodding reminder that our time is brief, that all the wonders of creation are ultimately impermanent.
That's what they were going for, right?
Thursday, December 22, 2011
NO ADULTS ADMITTED WITHOUT CHILDREN
Sure, this is depressing on so many levels.
Made in 1964, this thing was still being played in theaters at least until the late seventies, these ads playing during every commercial break on local afternoon kids' shows. (I remember my brother and I trying to work the word "funtastic" into everyday conversation.) And even when I was a kid, I thought this thing looked like crap, and some part of me resented how the huckster creators of this thing used the goodwill of the holiday season as an excuse to peddle their shoddy goods, to take money from audiences while giving them absolutely nothing in return.
That was then, this is now.
And though this, too, seeks to exploit the good feelings of this time of year for a quick buck, it maybe seems at first to be a little less vile in intent. The audience being fleeced by this movie is at least made up of adults.
Except...the economy is still in the toilet. The vast majority of the country must think twice before spending their money. Sure, it's fun to go out to the movies, but if you're going to pony up the dough for not only the price of tickets, but also snacks, dinner before or after, parking, a baby sitter...well, you're talking a substantial investment. Which is fine, if the movie's any good. But come on...there's no way anybody involved in this thing thought they were making a good movie. They simply wanted to separate you from your money, money that could have been spent buying presents for loved ones or giving to charity. This movie is the work of millionaires who feel they aren't rich enough.
Made in 1964, this thing was still being played in theaters at least until the late seventies, these ads playing during every commercial break on local afternoon kids' shows. (I remember my brother and I trying to work the word "funtastic" into everyday conversation.) And even when I was a kid, I thought this thing looked like crap, and some part of me resented how the huckster creators of this thing used the goodwill of the holiday season as an excuse to peddle their shoddy goods, to take money from audiences while giving them absolutely nothing in return.
That was then, this is now.
And though this, too, seeks to exploit the good feelings of this time of year for a quick buck, it maybe seems at first to be a little less vile in intent. The audience being fleeced by this movie is at least made up of adults.
Except...the economy is still in the toilet. The vast majority of the country must think twice before spending their money. Sure, it's fun to go out to the movies, but if you're going to pony up the dough for not only the price of tickets, but also snacks, dinner before or after, parking, a baby sitter...well, you're talking a substantial investment. Which is fine, if the movie's any good. But come on...there's no way anybody involved in this thing thought they were making a good movie. They simply wanted to separate you from your money, money that could have been spent buying presents for loved ones or giving to charity. This movie is the work of millionaires who feel they aren't rich enough.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
MARVELOUS, MAGICAL...AAUUGGHH!!!
Haven't been around here much. Life goes on, and sometimes gets in the way. I gave some thought to posting a recollection of a particularly vivid dream I had the other night--it involved a right-wing cabal reanimating Bill Cullen's corpse to spearhead an incredibly misconceived bid for world dominance--but whenever I'd sit down to actually write, some distraction would raise its head. (Those Wikipedia entries on Patrick Hernandez and Jeff Altman won't read themselves, y'know.)
So, um, yeah...I've got nothing. Thus, lacking any real entertainment here, let me present an ad for what has to be the worst imaginable Christmas present. Enjoy, I guess.
So, um, yeah...I've got nothing. Thus, lacking any real entertainment here, let me present an ad for what has to be the worst imaginable Christmas present. Enjoy, I guess.
Friday, December 02, 2011
WARMTH
Mom's here, so I know it's a dream. Still, I follow her as we go wherever it is we're going. She moves quickly and without a walker through masses of people standing around or sitting at cheap tables--Is this Ryan's Steakhouse?--until we find a place in a corner. "Finally," she says, sitting down. "We have a few minutes to talk."
My eyes snap open. Again.
I don't believe in messages from the other side or crap like that, but it's become a disturbing pattern that Mom will appear to me in dreams, announcing she has something to tell me, and I wake up before she gets a chance to talk. It's the same every damn time, and the return to the waking world always comes with a tightness in my chest, a sense of loss so overpowering it seems nothing could heal it.
Right on cue, Staley appears.
When she first came into my life, Staley seemed odd and a bit reserved, the exact opposite of a pet me-pet me cat. She'd hide a lot, only occasionally appearing in corners of rooms, then venturing up onto the foot of the bed, or maybe sitting in chairs for a few minutes, only to disappear to whatever secret hiding place she'd chosen.
Lately, though, she seems to sense my moods, and is always there when I need her. As I wake from this dream with a sense of emptiness, she burrows in close to my chest, purring loudly. "You're not alone," she seems to be saying. "I'm always here." She stretches a front leg, the white toes on her otherwise gray paw gently stroke my open hand.
Most nights, I go to bed before Janie does, and Staley bounces in with me. She's always wherever I go. Cats aren't allowed up on my desk, but Staley is. She follows me to the door when I leave for work, and Janie says she frequently yowls for a few minutes after I leave.
The tightness in my chest is gone. I'm relaxed and feel myself drifting back to sleep, comforted to know that I have a fuzzy gray protector, that Staley's soul is here to give comfort to mine.
My eyes snap open. Again.
I don't believe in messages from the other side or crap like that, but it's become a disturbing pattern that Mom will appear to me in dreams, announcing she has something to tell me, and I wake up before she gets a chance to talk. It's the same every damn time, and the return to the waking world always comes with a tightness in my chest, a sense of loss so overpowering it seems nothing could heal it.
Right on cue, Staley appears.
When she first came into my life, Staley seemed odd and a bit reserved, the exact opposite of a pet me-pet me cat. She'd hide a lot, only occasionally appearing in corners of rooms, then venturing up onto the foot of the bed, or maybe sitting in chairs for a few minutes, only to disappear to whatever secret hiding place she'd chosen.
Lately, though, she seems to sense my moods, and is always there when I need her. As I wake from this dream with a sense of emptiness, she burrows in close to my chest, purring loudly. "You're not alone," she seems to be saying. "I'm always here." She stretches a front leg, the white toes on her otherwise gray paw gently stroke my open hand.
Most nights, I go to bed before Janie does, and Staley bounces in with me. She's always wherever I go. Cats aren't allowed up on my desk, but Staley is. She follows me to the door when I leave for work, and Janie says she frequently yowls for a few minutes after I leave.
The tightness in my chest is gone. I'm relaxed and feel myself drifting back to sleep, comforted to know that I have a fuzzy gray protector, that Staley's soul is here to give comfort to mine.
Monday, November 28, 2011
I HOPE THAT SOMETHING BETTER COMES ALONG
I really, really wanted to love The Muppets, the new big-screen attempt to bring Jim Henson's beloved characters some current pop culture cachet, and...well, I just couldn't.
Not that I hated it, mind you. This isn't a shameful misunderstanding of everything that makes the characters great, the Space Jam of the Muppet world. If anything, it's too reverent, tries too hard to evoke warm and fuzzy memories, attempting to coast on a sentiment it simply hasn't earned. It's made by fans, obviously--the primary fan, in this case, being co-writer and star Jason Segel, who has publicly stated over and over how much the Muppets meant to him--but as a result, it feels like glorified fan fiction. The real Muppet crew would never have made this.
That crew is scattered to the winds, of course. Jim Henson, Richard Hunt and writer Jerry Juhl are dead, Jerry Nelson has largely retired and Frank Oz...honestly, it's kind of hard to know what's up with Oz these days. Of the old guard, only Dave Goelz and Steve Whitmire are involved, and too many of the characters lack their old spark. Henson, Nelson and especially Oz were renowned for their ability to give their characters distinctive physical mannerisms, odd bits of business that brought them to life, but all too often, the characters now just seem to move from Point A to Point B without any real sense of life.
Then again, there's not much life to the script by Segel and Nicholas Stoller. It cleverly riffs on many beloved Muppet tropes and gags, and has some genuinely funny moments--the sight of Wayne and Wanda making out gave me great delight--but it just tries too hard. Most disastrously, the catalyst for the story is a new Muppet named Walter, who is blessed with not a single interesting feature. Favorites like Gonzo and Rowlf are given nothing to do so this character can go through a Screenwriting 101 Character Arc, and why? It's like making a new Peanuts movie and sidelining Charlie Brown and Lucy in favor of Shermy.
The most exasperating thing about Walter is that he's not remotely funny, but you know who else doesn't have a single decent laugh line in this movie? Kermit The Frog. Sure, he's the starry-eyed dreamer and all that, but Kermit's always gotten some of the best gags. But he spends the entire running time of The Muppets (that is, when he's not reminding the audience what an awesome new character Walter is) being mopey. And when he finally breaks into The Rainbow Connection...
Look, if you've spent any time at this site at all, you've seen countless vintage Muppet clips posted, you've read all sorts of stories about how my Mom cried for days on end when Jim Henson died, how Bein' Green was the one song she stipulated had to be played at her funeral, and, for crying out loud, I went through a period there where most of the titles of my posts were taken from Muppet Movie lyrics. All I have to do is hear the banjo-plucking intro to The Rainbow Connection and I immediately tear up.
And yet, its performance here did nothing for me. Instead of an Applause sign, it felt like the filmmakers were using a Sentimental Tears sign. The honest emotions that Jim Henson and company could evoke effortlessly just isn't there anymore. I wouldn't presume to say that the time of The Muppets passed with Henson, but it's been twenty-one years since the man's death, and the characters still seem trapped, unsure where to go. Despite the brilliant efforts of his fellow puppeteers, designers, scriptwriters and songwriters, maybe the only person who truly understood what made The Muppets work was Henson. We know it was probably magic.
The Muppets is an honest attempt to bring back that magic, but a failed attempt just the same. Still, if nothing else, it proves that audiences still have great love for these characters, and maybe next time they'll get where they're going. Or, as Gonzo so eloquently put it, they're going to go back there someday.
Not that I hated it, mind you. This isn't a shameful misunderstanding of everything that makes the characters great, the Space Jam of the Muppet world. If anything, it's too reverent, tries too hard to evoke warm and fuzzy memories, attempting to coast on a sentiment it simply hasn't earned. It's made by fans, obviously--the primary fan, in this case, being co-writer and star Jason Segel, who has publicly stated over and over how much the Muppets meant to him--but as a result, it feels like glorified fan fiction. The real Muppet crew would never have made this.
That crew is scattered to the winds, of course. Jim Henson, Richard Hunt and writer Jerry Juhl are dead, Jerry Nelson has largely retired and Frank Oz...honestly, it's kind of hard to know what's up with Oz these days. Of the old guard, only Dave Goelz and Steve Whitmire are involved, and too many of the characters lack their old spark. Henson, Nelson and especially Oz were renowned for their ability to give their characters distinctive physical mannerisms, odd bits of business that brought them to life, but all too often, the characters now just seem to move from Point A to Point B without any real sense of life.
Then again, there's not much life to the script by Segel and Nicholas Stoller. It cleverly riffs on many beloved Muppet tropes and gags, and has some genuinely funny moments--the sight of Wayne and Wanda making out gave me great delight--but it just tries too hard. Most disastrously, the catalyst for the story is a new Muppet named Walter, who is blessed with not a single interesting feature. Favorites like Gonzo and Rowlf are given nothing to do so this character can go through a Screenwriting 101 Character Arc, and why? It's like making a new Peanuts movie and sidelining Charlie Brown and Lucy in favor of Shermy.
The most exasperating thing about Walter is that he's not remotely funny, but you know who else doesn't have a single decent laugh line in this movie? Kermit The Frog. Sure, he's the starry-eyed dreamer and all that, but Kermit's always gotten some of the best gags. But he spends the entire running time of The Muppets (that is, when he's not reminding the audience what an awesome new character Walter is) being mopey. And when he finally breaks into The Rainbow Connection...
Look, if you've spent any time at this site at all, you've seen countless vintage Muppet clips posted, you've read all sorts of stories about how my Mom cried for days on end when Jim Henson died, how Bein' Green was the one song she stipulated had to be played at her funeral, and, for crying out loud, I went through a period there where most of the titles of my posts were taken from Muppet Movie lyrics. All I have to do is hear the banjo-plucking intro to The Rainbow Connection and I immediately tear up.
And yet, its performance here did nothing for me. Instead of an Applause sign, it felt like the filmmakers were using a Sentimental Tears sign. The honest emotions that Jim Henson and company could evoke effortlessly just isn't there anymore. I wouldn't presume to say that the time of The Muppets passed with Henson, but it's been twenty-one years since the man's death, and the characters still seem trapped, unsure where to go. Despite the brilliant efforts of his fellow puppeteers, designers, scriptwriters and songwriters, maybe the only person who truly understood what made The Muppets work was Henson. We know it was probably magic.
The Muppets is an honest attempt to bring back that magic, but a failed attempt just the same. Still, if nothing else, it proves that audiences still have great love for these characters, and maybe next time they'll get where they're going. Or, as Gonzo so eloquently put it, they're going to go back there someday.
Thursday, November 24, 2011
IT'S JUST A SHOW
Thanksgiving, right? I should list all the things I'm thankful for (my health, my home, my friends, the cats, beloved beagle and, of course, Janie), I could reminisce about holidays past, I could do any number of things.
Or I could tell a story I've told before.
Because this is November 24th, the day when, twenty-three years ago, a scrappy UHF station in Minneapolis first broadcast a crudely-produced program entitled Mystery Science Theater 3000, a vehicle for local comedian made good Joel Hodgson. The premise was simple: Hodgson played a guy trapped in space, forced by his evil overlords to watch terrible movies. He did, with the help of his two robot pals, and the three of them would crack wise all through the movie.
Simple, and potentially awful. But somehow, MST3K (which got a lot better than that original intro would suggest)transcended its simple premise, ultimately running for ten seasons on two different cable channels, and bearing a profound influence on the world of comedy. It has provided its fans with an alternate way of looking at the world, has encouraged, in its small way, its viewers to never accept what is given to them, to talk back, to question. And it has provided comfort.
As on that Wednesday night, when I stumbled home dead tired from working late. When I got to my apartment, I found numerous messages on my answering machine from my sister Ann, informing me that Mom was in the hospital. Finally, a message from Mom herself, assuring me that she was okay, I could call her or stop by to see her, but she understood if I was busy.
I went up to see her. She'd fallen, and had...never mind. You don't need to know the details. The point is, she looked so small, so fragile, so...mortal. But she was still Mom, and we talked, though her voice was weak. "Have you eaten yet?" she asked, always more concerned about others than herself. No, I said, I'd probably just go home and have a pizza. "Oh, yes, it's Wednesday, isn't it? Are you going to watch an MST?" (She was, obviously, aware of my weekly ritual.) Yeah, maybe, I said, but I can stay here. "No," she said. "I have to watch Lost."
So I went home, fired up the pizza and the VCR and chose an episode of MST to watch. I hadn't seen the episode where they mock Roger Corman's Gunslinger in awhile, so that's what I picked, completely at random. Halfway through the show, there's this sketch:
I thought nothing of it, or any of the other odd reminders of mortality in this particular episode. Why would I? It's not like Mom was dying or anything. I enjoyed the episode, laughed myself silly, and went to bed.
The next morning, Ann called early. Someone from the hospital had let her know it would be a good idea to get up there and see Mom. Wait, what? She just fell. How could that lead to...to...Dear God, no.
If you've spent any time at this site, you know what happened, since this space was originally conceived as a way of working through my grief. The days after her death were spent dealing with the usual things, but it was funny. She died on a Thursday, the funeral was the following Monday...but by Tuesday, I felt cried out. I didn't want to be sad anymore.
So I turned again to MST3K, and it did the trick. I laughed, and it was as though my whole world hadn't changed, as if things would be okay again. It reminded me that there was still joy in the world, and that life, not unlike Celine Dion's heart, would go on.
When I think of my favorite TV shows of all time, I think of The Mary Tyler Moore Show, or Columbo, or Wiseguy or Batman: The Animated Series or The Simpsons or so many more. But I never think to include Mystery Science Theater 3000 on that list, because, no matter what the theme song says, it's never been just a show. It's part of my life.
Or I could tell a story I've told before.
Because this is November 24th, the day when, twenty-three years ago, a scrappy UHF station in Minneapolis first broadcast a crudely-produced program entitled Mystery Science Theater 3000, a vehicle for local comedian made good Joel Hodgson. The premise was simple: Hodgson played a guy trapped in space, forced by his evil overlords to watch terrible movies. He did, with the help of his two robot pals, and the three of them would crack wise all through the movie.
Simple, and potentially awful. But somehow, MST3K (which got a lot better than that original intro would suggest)transcended its simple premise, ultimately running for ten seasons on two different cable channels, and bearing a profound influence on the world of comedy. It has provided its fans with an alternate way of looking at the world, has encouraged, in its small way, its viewers to never accept what is given to them, to talk back, to question. And it has provided comfort.
As on that Wednesday night, when I stumbled home dead tired from working late. When I got to my apartment, I found numerous messages on my answering machine from my sister Ann, informing me that Mom was in the hospital. Finally, a message from Mom herself, assuring me that she was okay, I could call her or stop by to see her, but she understood if I was busy.
I went up to see her. She'd fallen, and had...never mind. You don't need to know the details. The point is, she looked so small, so fragile, so...mortal. But she was still Mom, and we talked, though her voice was weak. "Have you eaten yet?" she asked, always more concerned about others than herself. No, I said, I'd probably just go home and have a pizza. "Oh, yes, it's Wednesday, isn't it? Are you going to watch an MST?" (She was, obviously, aware of my weekly ritual.) Yeah, maybe, I said, but I can stay here. "No," she said. "I have to watch Lost."
So I went home, fired up the pizza and the VCR and chose an episode of MST to watch. I hadn't seen the episode where they mock Roger Corman's Gunslinger in awhile, so that's what I picked, completely at random. Halfway through the show, there's this sketch:
I thought nothing of it, or any of the other odd reminders of mortality in this particular episode. Why would I? It's not like Mom was dying or anything. I enjoyed the episode, laughed myself silly, and went to bed.
The next morning, Ann called early. Someone from the hospital had let her know it would be a good idea to get up there and see Mom. Wait, what? She just fell. How could that lead to...to...Dear God, no.
If you've spent any time at this site, you know what happened, since this space was originally conceived as a way of working through my grief. The days after her death were spent dealing with the usual things, but it was funny. She died on a Thursday, the funeral was the following Monday...but by Tuesday, I felt cried out. I didn't want to be sad anymore.
So I turned again to MST3K, and it did the trick. I laughed, and it was as though my whole world hadn't changed, as if things would be okay again. It reminded me that there was still joy in the world, and that life, not unlike Celine Dion's heart, would go on.
When I think of my favorite TV shows of all time, I think of The Mary Tyler Moore Show, or Columbo, or Wiseguy or Batman: The Animated Series or The Simpsons or so many more. But I never think to include Mystery Science Theater 3000 on that list, because, no matter what the theme song says, it's never been just a show. It's part of my life.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
THEN THAT ELEVATOR STARTS ITS RIDE
Isabella pulls on her leash, the same walk we take every morning. Down the sidewalk, across the street, through the parking lot of the neighboring restaurant. It's closed, but even at 3 AM, there's music coming from within--Louis Prima and Keely Smith, That Old Black Magic. We stop for a minute, Isabella's nose snuffling the ground, me listening to the music.
I try to remember.
My ex-wife loved Louis Prima. This song makes me think of her, but only in the abstract. When I try to conjure details of our time together, there's often nothing there. I remember, for instance, her love of Prima, and I remember buying her a documentary about him, and that we watched it together. I know we did that, but I don't remember how it felt.
She and I still talk, usually once a week, and we remain as close as two people who profoundly hurt each other can possibly be. She fills me in on the broad details of her life, and I do the same. On occasions, these conversations spark a certain detail, a shared inside joke, a memory only the two of us would share.
Mostly, though, I don't recall specifics. When I think of our time together, mostly what comes to mind is the anxiety, the sense that it was all somehow going to end. I can't even remember the no doubt terrible arguments and incidents that produced this mindset, just the general feeling, the state of flux.
The wind picks up, frustrating Isabella. The breeze carries so many different scents, too many for her to pick out. She skitters about, wanting to follow her nose in all directions at once.
I pull on her leash, leading her back home. My life with Janie is different from the life I once led, different from anything I ever imagined. For maybe the first time in my adult life, I've learned to accept things as they come, and I finally know contentment. Isabella's pace quickens as we approach the house, and she bounds up the steps happily. Because, you know, we're home.
I try to remember.
My ex-wife loved Louis Prima. This song makes me think of her, but only in the abstract. When I try to conjure details of our time together, there's often nothing there. I remember, for instance, her love of Prima, and I remember buying her a documentary about him, and that we watched it together. I know we did that, but I don't remember how it felt.
She and I still talk, usually once a week, and we remain as close as two people who profoundly hurt each other can possibly be. She fills me in on the broad details of her life, and I do the same. On occasions, these conversations spark a certain detail, a shared inside joke, a memory only the two of us would share.
Mostly, though, I don't recall specifics. When I think of our time together, mostly what comes to mind is the anxiety, the sense that it was all somehow going to end. I can't even remember the no doubt terrible arguments and incidents that produced this mindset, just the general feeling, the state of flux.
The wind picks up, frustrating Isabella. The breeze carries so many different scents, too many for her to pick out. She skitters about, wanting to follow her nose in all directions at once.
I pull on her leash, leading her back home. My life with Janie is different from the life I once led, different from anything I ever imagined. For maybe the first time in my adult life, I've learned to accept things as they come, and I finally know contentment. Isabella's pace quickens as we approach the house, and she bounds up the steps happily. Because, you know, we're home.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
IS THE CALLER THERE?
1) Wow--an authentic Random Thoughts post. Formerly one of my regular go-to pieces (along with clips of Lynda Carter singing) when I didn't feel like doing any actual writing and just started knocking out whatever crap popped into my head at the moment.
In the present case, however, there's slightly more thought put into this effort--mostly these are scattered premises, things I wanted to write about in a little more depth, but just never had the time. Or energy. Or will power...
2) I'm pretty sure I claimed somewhere along the line that I wasn't going to say anything more about Spider-Man: Turn Off The Dark, and well, I tried, but our old friend Julie Taymor has been at it again, and I just can't resist.
Taymor has been exceptionally busy, what with filing a lawsuit against the show's producers and giving a monumentally self-pitying interview to Esquire in which she claimed to be shocked, shocked I tell you, at her dismissal from the show, which she thought was just swell.
Of course, the terrible reviews for Taymor's version of the show, and the fact that she refused to even consider dropping elements that clearly weren't working, and her increasingly incoherent public statements about the show, which suggested she considered the whole thing to be some sort of workshop for her private vision, even though the thing was bleeding investors dry to the tune of almost a million bucks a week--none of these things had any bearing on the decision of the producers to fire her. They were just philistines who didn't care about Art.
As for the lawsuit, Taymor is demanding a share of profits (which, despite the fact that the show sells out nightly, it still hasn't earned a dime, mostly because Taymor burned through SIXTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS while in the process of finding her "vision") and, more amusingly, claiming copyright infringement for using elements she created in the show.
Obviously, I don't know the details of her contract, but that's pretty much how big Broadway musicals work--nobody is irreplaceable. Creative personnel are constantly brought in and let go, but they're doing for-hire jobs--producers have every right to use elements of their work, because that's why they were hired in the first place. More talented people than Taymor have been fired off shows, only to see work they did used on stage, often without credit.
In the case of Spider-Man: Turn Off The Dark--have I mentioned that's the worst title for anything in history?--Taymor is actually listed in the credits. If anything, the producers indulged her for way too long. Is she actually trying to get people to feel sorry for her? Because I'm pretty sure it's not working.
3) Alexander Payne's new film The Descendants opens this week, a mere seven years since his last feature, Sideways, which opened two years after About Schmidt. He's not terribly prolific, is what I'm saying.
I'm a big fan--Sideways hit me where I lived--but it's not like he's Stanley Kubrick. He makes humanist comedies somewhat in the manner of Paul Mazursky, only Mazursky could really crank 'em out. (Have I mentioned Harry And Tonto is one of my favorite movies ever?) But Payne, like Paul Thomas Anderson and David O. Russell, is a major filmmaker with a disappointingly thin filmography. All three cite the great directors of the seventies as inspiration, but they seem to not realize that those guys worked constantly.
Sure, studios aren't keen to produce odd personal efforts these days, but the financing is obviously out there--Joel and Ethan Coen are able to make whatever pops into their head, and they were managing the Woody Allen trick of knocking out a movie a year for awhile there. Payne, Anderson and Russell seem to only want to work when the muse strikes, but even Robert Altman made Quintet. It's okay to fail--just keep working.
What I'm basically saying is, I love these guys' stuff, and I selfishly want more than they've given me.
4) Hey, are there any long-time readers of this thing still around? Remember when I used to go off on long-winded political screeds? No, I don't miss those things either, but still...Occupy Wall Street, Rick Perry's memory lapse, the whole Penn State thing...you'd think I'd have something to say. Sometimes this space seems a little hermetically sealed, cut off from the real world, like late period Woody Allen. (Zing!) I kind of regret that, and kind of not. Maybe I'll reengage with the real world soon.
5) Ordinarily, I'd say something about all the critters here, about Cookie's continued reluctance to play nice with the beagle, or about Staley's odd habit of head-butting me in the middle of the night. Certainly I don't need to say anything about Delmar, because I'm always going on about him here.
Except yesterday morning, Del was sitting in my lap as I read the funnies when he suddenly, for no reason, reached up and slashed my nose. Blood poured everywhere, including into my eyes, leading me to temporarily think he'd blinded me. And, needless to say, it hurt like hell.
And yet, he's back on my lap as I write this. I'll never learn.
In the present case, however, there's slightly more thought put into this effort--mostly these are scattered premises, things I wanted to write about in a little more depth, but just never had the time. Or energy. Or will power...
2) I'm pretty sure I claimed somewhere along the line that I wasn't going to say anything more about Spider-Man: Turn Off The Dark, and well, I tried, but our old friend Julie Taymor has been at it again, and I just can't resist.
Taymor has been exceptionally busy, what with filing a lawsuit against the show's producers and giving a monumentally self-pitying interview to Esquire in which she claimed to be shocked, shocked I tell you, at her dismissal from the show, which she thought was just swell.
Of course, the terrible reviews for Taymor's version of the show, and the fact that she refused to even consider dropping elements that clearly weren't working, and her increasingly incoherent public statements about the show, which suggested she considered the whole thing to be some sort of workshop for her private vision, even though the thing was bleeding investors dry to the tune of almost a million bucks a week--none of these things had any bearing on the decision of the producers to fire her. They were just philistines who didn't care about Art.
As for the lawsuit, Taymor is demanding a share of profits (which, despite the fact that the show sells out nightly, it still hasn't earned a dime, mostly because Taymor burned through SIXTY-FIVE MILLION DOLLARS while in the process of finding her "vision") and, more amusingly, claiming copyright infringement for using elements she created in the show.
Obviously, I don't know the details of her contract, but that's pretty much how big Broadway musicals work--nobody is irreplaceable. Creative personnel are constantly brought in and let go, but they're doing for-hire jobs--producers have every right to use elements of their work, because that's why they were hired in the first place. More talented people than Taymor have been fired off shows, only to see work they did used on stage, often without credit.
In the case of Spider-Man: Turn Off The Dark--have I mentioned that's the worst title for anything in history?--Taymor is actually listed in the credits. If anything, the producers indulged her for way too long. Is she actually trying to get people to feel sorry for her? Because I'm pretty sure it's not working.
3) Alexander Payne's new film The Descendants opens this week, a mere seven years since his last feature, Sideways, which opened two years after About Schmidt. He's not terribly prolific, is what I'm saying.
I'm a big fan--Sideways hit me where I lived--but it's not like he's Stanley Kubrick. He makes humanist comedies somewhat in the manner of Paul Mazursky, only Mazursky could really crank 'em out. (Have I mentioned Harry And Tonto is one of my favorite movies ever?) But Payne, like Paul Thomas Anderson and David O. Russell, is a major filmmaker with a disappointingly thin filmography. All three cite the great directors of the seventies as inspiration, but they seem to not realize that those guys worked constantly.
Sure, studios aren't keen to produce odd personal efforts these days, but the financing is obviously out there--Joel and Ethan Coen are able to make whatever pops into their head, and they were managing the Woody Allen trick of knocking out a movie a year for awhile there. Payne, Anderson and Russell seem to only want to work when the muse strikes, but even Robert Altman made Quintet. It's okay to fail--just keep working.
What I'm basically saying is, I love these guys' stuff, and I selfishly want more than they've given me.
4) Hey, are there any long-time readers of this thing still around? Remember when I used to go off on long-winded political screeds? No, I don't miss those things either, but still...Occupy Wall Street, Rick Perry's memory lapse, the whole Penn State thing...you'd think I'd have something to say. Sometimes this space seems a little hermetically sealed, cut off from the real world, like late period Woody Allen. (Zing!) I kind of regret that, and kind of not. Maybe I'll reengage with the real world soon.
5) Ordinarily, I'd say something about all the critters here, about Cookie's continued reluctance to play nice with the beagle, or about Staley's odd habit of head-butting me in the middle of the night. Certainly I don't need to say anything about Delmar, because I'm always going on about him here.
Except yesterday morning, Del was sitting in my lap as I read the funnies when he suddenly, for no reason, reached up and slashed my nose. Blood poured everywhere, including into my eyes, leading me to temporarily think he'd blinded me. And, needless to say, it hurt like hell.
And yet, he's back on my lap as I write this. I'll never learn.
Friday, November 11, 2011
THESE MEMORIES LOSE THEIR MEANING
Not a lot of snow, but enough: Branches down, and others cracked, hanging dangerously low over some wires.
Oh Lord, has it come to this? Am I really using snow-covered branches as some sort of metaphor for my emotional state? Isn't that the most tired literary device imaginable? Has my writing become this trite?
Still. It's not a cheap use of a tired trope when it's actually true. The branches really are hanging, and so is my mood.
Some back story might be helpful at this point, yes? I got an email from my brother John the other day informing me of the death of our uncle, Ronald Dean Hegstrom. John was quite sad, remembering the last family reunion (which--ominous chord--I did not attend), and how Uncle Deanie, in John's words, "looked like Dad, only different."
But this news didn't make me feel sad, just numb. For so long, I associated Uncle Deanie and Aunt LeDora with the family reunions I actively hated as a kid, which were attended by people so much older than me, and there was never anyone for me to hang out with, so I'd just sit there, isolated and lonely. It never occurred to me to, you know, talk to anyone. They all seemed to know each other so well.
So I never got to know Uncle Deanie, and reading his obit, how he served in the military in Greenland and worked as a repair man, things I knew but didn't know, or didn't appreciate, because I never took the time, but damn, I was just a kid, what do you want from me? Yeah, I could've taken the time as I got older, but, well...I didn't, and...
Look, that's not even what has me feeling so numb. It's John's description of our uncle as looking kind of like Dad--because even my memories of Dad are starting to fade. There are fleeting images, things I remember, still these become less concrete with each passing year, with each passing minute.
How can this happen? Not just dad, but Mom, too, and everything about my childhood. I can remember specific things, doing this and that, but the details of the faces that accompanied these activities, the sounds of voices, the smells and colors--all are going, all are past.
But I do remember the summer I turned seven, before I had my own room. I slept on the couch in the living room, and when I went to bed, Dad would come over and kiss me goodnight. His breath smelled like Grain Belt and he barely said a word, but it was a small gesture of love that meant the world to me. Maybe it's why I make a point of saying goodbye to the dog and all the cats whenever I go somewhere.
So I have that to hang onto. Maybe I'm not as numb as I think. Maybe the branches can be easily trimmed. Maybe there's nothing broken that can't be fixed.
Oh Lord, has it come to this? Am I really using snow-covered branches as some sort of metaphor for my emotional state? Isn't that the most tired literary device imaginable? Has my writing become this trite?
Still. It's not a cheap use of a tired trope when it's actually true. The branches really are hanging, and so is my mood.
Some back story might be helpful at this point, yes? I got an email from my brother John the other day informing me of the death of our uncle, Ronald Dean Hegstrom. John was quite sad, remembering the last family reunion (which--ominous chord--I did not attend), and how Uncle Deanie, in John's words, "looked like Dad, only different."
But this news didn't make me feel sad, just numb. For so long, I associated Uncle Deanie and Aunt LeDora with the family reunions I actively hated as a kid, which were attended by people so much older than me, and there was never anyone for me to hang out with, so I'd just sit there, isolated and lonely. It never occurred to me to, you know, talk to anyone. They all seemed to know each other so well.
So I never got to know Uncle Deanie, and reading his obit, how he served in the military in Greenland and worked as a repair man, things I knew but didn't know, or didn't appreciate, because I never took the time, but damn, I was just a kid, what do you want from me? Yeah, I could've taken the time as I got older, but, well...I didn't, and...
Look, that's not even what has me feeling so numb. It's John's description of our uncle as looking kind of like Dad--because even my memories of Dad are starting to fade. There are fleeting images, things I remember, still these become less concrete with each passing year, with each passing minute.
How can this happen? Not just dad, but Mom, too, and everything about my childhood. I can remember specific things, doing this and that, but the details of the faces that accompanied these activities, the sounds of voices, the smells and colors--all are going, all are past.
But I do remember the summer I turned seven, before I had my own room. I slept on the couch in the living room, and when I went to bed, Dad would come over and kiss me goodnight. His breath smelled like Grain Belt and he barely said a word, but it was a small gesture of love that meant the world to me. Maybe it's why I make a point of saying goodbye to the dog and all the cats whenever I go somewhere.
So I have that to hang onto. Maybe I'm not as numb as I think. Maybe the branches can be easily trimmed. Maybe there's nothing broken that can't be fixed.
Saturday, November 05, 2011
KEEP A PENCIL HANDY
Ah, I should never have posted that Bert Parks clip yesterday. It served as a virtual portal to hell, a hell long-time readers of this site (both of you!) know all too well: The seventies variety show.
It seems utterly inconceivable that in 1976, the year the Sex Pistols recorded Anarchy In The UK, the year Taxi Driver was released to theaters, a year in a decade in which everything changed at tremendous speed, TV executives still held so tenaciously to what had worked before. Except it didn't work anymore; the variety format was obviously dead if the best it could muster was Telly Savalas. It's a terrible idea even in theory. Did they really need to produce this thing--and worse, put it on the air?--to realize this? Did they think anyone could possibly enjoy this?
'76 must have been the year TV executives just collectively decided to throw anything on to see what would happen. If Telly Savalas could have a variety special, why not Paul Lynde? Sure, and why not feature musical guests KISS and--the horror! the horror!--Florence Henderson? People will watch, won't they? Won't they?
Also in '76, The Captain And Tenille got their own regular series! So they could do things like this, thus scarring an entire nation.
And it's not like this celebration of sub-mediocrity was limited to variety shows. You could be innocently watching your favorite large-breasted action heroine when suddenly you're forced to ask yourself, "Why is Wonder Woman singing? And how can I make it stop?"
And then the horror would escalate, because if she could sing as Wonder Woman, suddenly someone thought it would be a good idea to give Lynda Carter her own variety special. And then they gave her another, and another, like she was good, like they were entertaining, when it should have been obvious that, Lordy, no, this was not entertaining in the least.
It seems utterly inconceivable that in 1976, the year the Sex Pistols recorded Anarchy In The UK, the year Taxi Driver was released to theaters, a year in a decade in which everything changed at tremendous speed, TV executives still held so tenaciously to what had worked before. Except it didn't work anymore; the variety format was obviously dead if the best it could muster was Telly Savalas. It's a terrible idea even in theory. Did they really need to produce this thing--and worse, put it on the air?--to realize this? Did they think anyone could possibly enjoy this?
'76 must have been the year TV executives just collectively decided to throw anything on to see what would happen. If Telly Savalas could have a variety special, why not Paul Lynde? Sure, and why not feature musical guests KISS and--the horror! the horror!--Florence Henderson? People will watch, won't they? Won't they?
Also in '76, The Captain And Tenille got their own regular series! So they could do things like this, thus scarring an entire nation.
And it's not like this celebration of sub-mediocrity was limited to variety shows. You could be innocently watching your favorite large-breasted action heroine when suddenly you're forced to ask yourself, "Why is Wonder Woman singing? And how can I make it stop?"
And then the horror would escalate, because if she could sing as Wonder Woman, suddenly someone thought it would be a good idea to give Lynda Carter her own variety special. And then they gave her another, and another, like she was good, like they were entertaining, when it should have been obvious that, Lordy, no, this was not entertaining in the least.
Friday, November 04, 2011
THE DRUMS ARE IN THE DAWN, AND ALL THE VOICES GONE
Go to Blogger Dashboard, hit New Post, tap out a few words, delete them, tap out a few different words, delete them, pause and idly wonder if the topic I've picked to write about is even all that interesting...which means I'm second-guessing myself...which means I no longer have the confidence that what I'm doing is worthwhile...which means...what?
No idea. That whole paralyzing writer's block thing, which inconveniently struck once before just as I was starting to actually get stuff published and, you know, earn money, and which decided to hang around for a decade or so--has it returned? Have I run out of things to say, or interesting ways to say them? Are there no more tortured Star Wars analogies for me to make?
Again, no idea. But hey, in the interest of (barely) fulfilling the minimum daily amount of entertainment one can expect from this site, here's a clip of Bert Parks performing a Paul McCartney song during the 1976 Miss America pageant. Regarding this, for lack of a better word, performance, I would note two things: 1) Those background dancers are staging what Crow T. Robot once referred to as a "mince-off" and 2) Back in '76, people watched this sort of thing in huge numbers, and mostly not ironically. Even at the time, I couldn't understand.
No idea. That whole paralyzing writer's block thing, which inconveniently struck once before just as I was starting to actually get stuff published and, you know, earn money, and which decided to hang around for a decade or so--has it returned? Have I run out of things to say, or interesting ways to say them? Are there no more tortured Star Wars analogies for me to make?
Again, no idea. But hey, in the interest of (barely) fulfilling the minimum daily amount of entertainment one can expect from this site, here's a clip of Bert Parks performing a Paul McCartney song during the 1976 Miss America pageant. Regarding this, for lack of a better word, performance, I would note two things: 1) Those background dancers are staging what Crow T. Robot once referred to as a "mince-off" and 2) Back in '76, people watched this sort of thing in huge numbers, and mostly not ironically. Even at the time, I couldn't understand.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
OH GOOD, I LIKE BUSTLING!
Paul had already seen this dreadful-looking new Three Musketeers, and wanted to see it again. "Nothing you'd rather see?" I asked, figuring literally anything would be better.
"No. You'll like it. It's really good."
OK, fine, but I demanded a price: Before going to this thing, he'd first watch Richard Lester's absolutely peerless 1973 adaptation of Musketeers. I explained that it's one of my favorite movies, which is usually a good way to get Paul reasonably intrigued. (He trusts my opinions, except about James Bond.) I started the movie and...
...He loved it. Well, why wouldn't he? Between an absolutely perfect cast (Charlton Heston's splendidly villainous Cardinal Richelieu is like a miniature acting class in itself), George MacDonald Fraser's witty script and some truly sumptuous settings, Lester is given free reign to make this material his own, and the result is not only a first-rate adventure tale, but one of the greatest comedies ever made.
I don't know how Lester did it: Hackneyed bits of physical comedy become gaspingly funny purely through his staging and cutting. That sort of thing almost never works; usually when a director fusses over a gag, it becomes notably less amusing. (The sheer visual invention Steven Spielberg brought to 1941 is admirable, but it won't make you laugh.) But here Lester repeatedly stages a scene in a seemingly deadpan manner, then cuts to a reverse angle which reveals its absurdity, and damned if it isn't funny every single time. And he knows just how long to hold a shot, just when to cut, just when o move the camera. He's just really good is what I'm saying, and The Three Musketeers (like its equally vital sequel, The Four Musketeers) is a world-class work of cinema.
Which is a pretty good thing o introduce a twelve-year-old to, don't you think? We went to the new Three Musketeers the next day--and just an aside here, but boy do I wish contemporary moviemakers would stop ending their movies with setups for sequels nobody will ever want to see--and Paul still claims to like this one better. That's understandable--it's pitched to contemporary kids, with explosions, wirework and whatnot. (Also some of the phoniest looking CGI you'll ever see.) It's all about immediate sensation.
But as for which one he'll actually remember, well, I have a feeling I know.
"No. You'll like it. It's really good."
OK, fine, but I demanded a price: Before going to this thing, he'd first watch Richard Lester's absolutely peerless 1973 adaptation of Musketeers. I explained that it's one of my favorite movies, which is usually a good way to get Paul reasonably intrigued. (He trusts my opinions, except about James Bond.) I started the movie and...
...He loved it. Well, why wouldn't he? Between an absolutely perfect cast (Charlton Heston's splendidly villainous Cardinal Richelieu is like a miniature acting class in itself), George MacDonald Fraser's witty script and some truly sumptuous settings, Lester is given free reign to make this material his own, and the result is not only a first-rate adventure tale, but one of the greatest comedies ever made.
I don't know how Lester did it: Hackneyed bits of physical comedy become gaspingly funny purely through his staging and cutting. That sort of thing almost never works; usually when a director fusses over a gag, it becomes notably less amusing. (The sheer visual invention Steven Spielberg brought to 1941 is admirable, but it won't make you laugh.) But here Lester repeatedly stages a scene in a seemingly deadpan manner, then cuts to a reverse angle which reveals its absurdity, and damned if it isn't funny every single time. And he knows just how long to hold a shot, just when to cut, just when o move the camera. He's just really good is what I'm saying, and The Three Musketeers (like its equally vital sequel, The Four Musketeers) is a world-class work of cinema.
Which is a pretty good thing o introduce a twelve-year-old to, don't you think? We went to the new Three Musketeers the next day--and just an aside here, but boy do I wish contemporary moviemakers would stop ending their movies with setups for sequels nobody will ever want to see--and Paul still claims to like this one better. That's understandable--it's pitched to contemporary kids, with explosions, wirework and whatnot. (Also some of the phoniest looking CGI you'll ever see.) It's all about immediate sensation.
But as for which one he'll actually remember, well, I have a feeling I know.
Friday, October 28, 2011
THE SOW IS MINE
Started and abandoned two different posts recently. One was just a silly generic thing, but the other was somewhat more personal in nature, and my inability to make it work disturbs me. I just haven't been feeling the writing thing lately, although annoying computer glitches haven't really helped. (When the screen freezes as you type, it kinda interrupts your train of thought.)
Anyway, just to post something, and in the spirit of Halloween, I thought I'd post something scary. Regular readers might expect me to follow that up with a clip of Linda Carter singing or David Naughton extolling the virtues of Dr. Pepper, but no, I'm serious.
I could (and probably have, and no doubt will again) go on for some time about The Exorcist, which freaked me the fuck out like no movie ever has. I was eleven when I saw it the first time--well, saw part of it; my brother wound up carrying me out of the theater because I was literally paralyzed with fear--and I think the reason it got to me was because it creates such a believable reality. The sets, the costumes, the lighting show no trace of artifice. Everything looks so lived in, seems so natural, and when things go to hell (more or less literally), the impact is...well, again, as I watched the scene embedded above, I felt my limbs going numb.
Oh, and you know what else scares me? This.
Anyway, just to post something, and in the spirit of Halloween, I thought I'd post something scary. Regular readers might expect me to follow that up with a clip of Linda Carter singing or David Naughton extolling the virtues of Dr. Pepper, but no, I'm serious.
I could (and probably have, and no doubt will again) go on for some time about The Exorcist, which freaked me the fuck out like no movie ever has. I was eleven when I saw it the first time--well, saw part of it; my brother wound up carrying me out of the theater because I was literally paralyzed with fear--and I think the reason it got to me was because it creates such a believable reality. The sets, the costumes, the lighting show no trace of artifice. Everything looks so lived in, seems so natural, and when things go to hell (more or less literally), the impact is...well, again, as I watched the scene embedded above, I felt my limbs going numb.
Oh, and you know what else scares me? This.
Friday, October 21, 2011
MAD LOVE
There is a slightly aloof, not-quite-there manner that defines feline behavior. Cats may be wonderful companions, but they always exist in a world of their own, somehow unknowable. They may share this world with you, but they are always a step removed.
Except for Delmar.
Whatever Del feels is always right there on the surface, and whether it's utter adoration or inexplicable rage--he has no middle ground--you will damn sure know about it.
He will sit on your lap and smoosh his face into your chest, his half-wheezed purr so intense his whole body vibrates, and one of his gangly legs may slither around your wrist, his paw caressing you, drawing your hand to him, making sure you will pet him even as he hugs you, his devotion so overpowering it almost terrifies.
Or he'll hop on your lap with his half-tail twitching, a growl already forming somewhere in his chest, and that same paw that lovingly stroked your hand will slap down on your wrist, a solitary claw sinking deeper and deeper until blood bubbles to the surface, and his fiery eyes will burn into you with a terrible anger.
Your instinct at this point would be to throw this wretched beast to the ground, but if instead you take your other hand--the one that isn't streaked with blood--and gently rub Del between his ears, those terrifying eyes will gradually close and something resembling bliss will pass across his sharply-angled face. His claw may or may not leave your hand, which has likely gone numb by now anyway, but one of his other paws may reach up to stroke your face.
And maybe sink a claw in there, too, but more gently, and compared to the pain in your hand, it's nothing. Maybe it will bleed as well, but that's part of the price you paid when you let him into your heart. He is in your heart, after all, because no matter what, you know how much he loves you, and if you didn't love him, who else ever would?
Except for Delmar.
Whatever Del feels is always right there on the surface, and whether it's utter adoration or inexplicable rage--he has no middle ground--you will damn sure know about it.
He will sit on your lap and smoosh his face into your chest, his half-wheezed purr so intense his whole body vibrates, and one of his gangly legs may slither around your wrist, his paw caressing you, drawing your hand to him, making sure you will pet him even as he hugs you, his devotion so overpowering it almost terrifies.
Or he'll hop on your lap with his half-tail twitching, a growl already forming somewhere in his chest, and that same paw that lovingly stroked your hand will slap down on your wrist, a solitary claw sinking deeper and deeper until blood bubbles to the surface, and his fiery eyes will burn into you with a terrible anger.
Your instinct at this point would be to throw this wretched beast to the ground, but if instead you take your other hand--the one that isn't streaked with blood--and gently rub Del between his ears, those terrifying eyes will gradually close and something resembling bliss will pass across his sharply-angled face. His claw may or may not leave your hand, which has likely gone numb by now anyway, but one of his other paws may reach up to stroke your face.
And maybe sink a claw in there, too, but more gently, and compared to the pain in your hand, it's nothing. Maybe it will bleed as well, but that's part of the price you paid when you let him into your heart. He is in your heart, after all, because no matter what, you know how much he loves you, and if you didn't love him, who else ever would?
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
THE BEST I CAN DO
There was a time when there would have been a reason for me to mention that I'm going on vacation for a few days. That is, my usual daily postings here would have been interrupted, so I felt the need to provide some sort of explanation.
Now, of course, I'm lucky if I knock out ten posts in an entire month. I could be hospitalized for a week and you, the theoretical reader, would never know. It's weird how much effort I used to put into this site, and how indifferent I seem to be these days. It's not that I don't have the will to write, it's just that sitting down to do it is so, like, hard and stuff. And, well...
Ah, screw it. I'll be back here when I get back. In the meantime, here's Marshall Crenshaw with one of my favorite covers of all time.
Now, of course, I'm lucky if I knock out ten posts in an entire month. I could be hospitalized for a week and you, the theoretical reader, would never know. It's weird how much effort I used to put into this site, and how indifferent I seem to be these days. It's not that I don't have the will to write, it's just that sitting down to do it is so, like, hard and stuff. And, well...
Ah, screw it. I'll be back here when I get back. In the meantime, here's Marshall Crenshaw with one of my favorite covers of all time.
Sunday, October 09, 2011
FADE LIKE MAGAZINES
The official reason is simple: I plan to turn the second bedroom into a kind of entertainment center. With my recently-acquired plasma TV, blu-ray player (wi-fi compatible) and surround sound system, it will be a place to retire from the world, to immerse myself in whatever sounds or images I crave at the moment.
To make room for all this, the bedroom had to be cleared of all the accumulated stuff that had piled up over the years. Most of it had been ported over from the apartment, where it was all dropped in boxes and moved to the house in order to save myself the time and trouble of actually sorting it. But this time, for whatever reason, I felt the need to decide what would be tossed and what would go down to the basement.
Some of this was easy. Did I really need to keep the program for Reefer Madness: The Musical? Nah--throw it away. And some of the work Psychokitty Delmar had done for me--he'd slept in some of the boxes and ripped up, for instance, the 1941 Des Moines Register with a beautiful Ding Darling illustration commemorating the attack on Pearl Harbor. I'd meant to have it framed or something, but now it was an easy toss.
Then there was...everything else. Family photos, drawings made by my ex-wife's niece, home-dubbed VHS tapes, calenders with important dates from my past marked on them, goofy cartoons drawn by my mom. These are things I dare not throw away, the only links I have to a life I once led. But what are they now?
They are of no real significance except that which I give them. Even examining them now, they draw me back, but there is something ultimately destructive about their siren song. There is no returning to the time from which they sprang, and no point in longing for it. My life now doesn't depend on any of this.
Or so I tell myself as I tape the boxes shut and lug them down to the basement, where they sit on shelves or piled on pallets on the floor to keep them dry. They still exist down there, but soon they'll just be more stuff that exists in the background, like the empty boxes of laundry soap I keep forgetting to put in the garbage, as forgotten as the memories they represent.
To make room for all this, the bedroom had to be cleared of all the accumulated stuff that had piled up over the years. Most of it had been ported over from the apartment, where it was all dropped in boxes and moved to the house in order to save myself the time and trouble of actually sorting it. But this time, for whatever reason, I felt the need to decide what would be tossed and what would go down to the basement.
Some of this was easy. Did I really need to keep the program for Reefer Madness: The Musical? Nah--throw it away. And some of the work Psychokitty Delmar had done for me--he'd slept in some of the boxes and ripped up, for instance, the 1941 Des Moines Register with a beautiful Ding Darling illustration commemorating the attack on Pearl Harbor. I'd meant to have it framed or something, but now it was an easy toss.
Then there was...everything else. Family photos, drawings made by my ex-wife's niece, home-dubbed VHS tapes, calenders with important dates from my past marked on them, goofy cartoons drawn by my mom. These are things I dare not throw away, the only links I have to a life I once led. But what are they now?
They are of no real significance except that which I give them. Even examining them now, they draw me back, but there is something ultimately destructive about their siren song. There is no returning to the time from which they sprang, and no point in longing for it. My life now doesn't depend on any of this.
Or so I tell myself as I tape the boxes shut and lug them down to the basement, where they sit on shelves or piled on pallets on the floor to keep them dry. They still exist down there, but soon they'll just be more stuff that exists in the background, like the empty boxes of laundry soap I keep forgetting to put in the garbage, as forgotten as the memories they represent.
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
DON'T DISAPPEAR NOW
WUMP!
Bella's on the floor, trembling, her legs flailing. She's having a seizure, something her vet has said is not uncommon with beagles. As long as they don't get more frequent, everything will be fine.
I pick her up and cradle her in my arms, as I always do. We know the drill. She'll shake violently for a few minutes, then stop. I'll plop her down on the ground, she'll walk, still a little shaky, to the door. She knows the seizure has made her lose control of her bodily functions, and she doesn't want to poop in the house.
Which is what happens. But after bringing her back in, she has another seizure. Then another, more violent. Her limbs twist as I hold her, the ferocity of her shaking causing my own body to tremble. Her mouth foams, she pees on me, and I cuddle her tighter, convinced at this moment that there is no greater love than what I feel for her.
Janie watches, and says she'll pray for Bella. I find myself doing the same, making every conceivable promise to God in exchange for this dog's life. I bawl like a fucking baby, pulling Bella tighter to my chest, mumbling, "Precious baby, love you, baby girl" over and over like a mantra, as if my words can make somehow make this stop.
Still. Somewhere my mind shuffles awful thoughts. Vet bills, meds, money I don't have. The credit cards are maxed out. How am I going to pay for this? What does she need? Can she be cured, or is this going to be a permanent condition? If she's like this all the time, will she...that is...can she live like this?
Her tremors become more intense, each worse than the last, and then her body goes limp, followed by an awful stillness. "Oh God, no!" I cry, my tears dropping onto her matted fur, already sopping wet with drool and pee.
Big brown eyes peer up at me. She inhales deeply, the tail half-heartedly wags. She raises her head and licks away my tears. I place her gently on the ground and she marches unsteadily to the door, then turns and looks at me, one long ear flopping over her tilted head, as if to say, "Come on! I gotta go!"
I grab her leash and we head outside. She takes the steps down from the deck carefully, but her stride becomes more certain as she moves through the grass. She does her business, then marches forward, head down, nose working overtime.
Scenting. Something has been in the grass, and she means to track it, tugging hard at her leash, doing what she was meant to do, as all good beagles must. I pull her leash in a different direction, back to the house, and she doesn't put up a fight.
She knows we both need rest.
Bella's on the floor, trembling, her legs flailing. She's having a seizure, something her vet has said is not uncommon with beagles. As long as they don't get more frequent, everything will be fine.
I pick her up and cradle her in my arms, as I always do. We know the drill. She'll shake violently for a few minutes, then stop. I'll plop her down on the ground, she'll walk, still a little shaky, to the door. She knows the seizure has made her lose control of her bodily functions, and she doesn't want to poop in the house.
Which is what happens. But after bringing her back in, she has another seizure. Then another, more violent. Her limbs twist as I hold her, the ferocity of her shaking causing my own body to tremble. Her mouth foams, she pees on me, and I cuddle her tighter, convinced at this moment that there is no greater love than what I feel for her.
Janie watches, and says she'll pray for Bella. I find myself doing the same, making every conceivable promise to God in exchange for this dog's life. I bawl like a fucking baby, pulling Bella tighter to my chest, mumbling, "Precious baby, love you, baby girl" over and over like a mantra, as if my words can make somehow make this stop.
Still. Somewhere my mind shuffles awful thoughts. Vet bills, meds, money I don't have. The credit cards are maxed out. How am I going to pay for this? What does she need? Can she be cured, or is this going to be a permanent condition? If she's like this all the time, will she...that is...can she live like this?
Her tremors become more intense, each worse than the last, and then her body goes limp, followed by an awful stillness. "Oh God, no!" I cry, my tears dropping onto her matted fur, already sopping wet with drool and pee.
Big brown eyes peer up at me. She inhales deeply, the tail half-heartedly wags. She raises her head and licks away my tears. I place her gently on the ground and she marches unsteadily to the door, then turns and looks at me, one long ear flopping over her tilted head, as if to say, "Come on! I gotta go!"
I grab her leash and we head outside. She takes the steps down from the deck carefully, but her stride becomes more certain as she moves through the grass. She does her business, then marches forward, head down, nose working overtime.
Scenting. Something has been in the grass, and she means to track it, tugging hard at her leash, doing what she was meant to do, as all good beagles must. I pull her leash in a different direction, back to the house, and she doesn't put up a fight.
She knows we both need rest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)